NOW's fraudulent abortion poster women

The National Organization for Women, (NOW), recently posted an Emergency Alert with the headline, "Bush Picks Anti-Roe Nominee," . . . Women's Lives on the Line."

In the alert, NOW included the photos of four women it said "are the faces of women who died because they could not obtain safe and legal abortions," below, the obvious inference being that a Supreme Court reversal of Roe vs Wade will cause women's deaths. Let's do some research on NOW's claims, . . . okay?? . . .

First, let's fully understand the issue: A reversal of Roe vs Wade issue will only take the abortion decision back to each of the 50 states, . . . it would not outlaw any abortion.

Secondly, if deaths from illegal abortions were so prevalent, why did NOW have to search back to 1929 to find one (Duvall) and 1940 for another (Shirley)??

And, thirdly, the person they identify as Becky Bell, died in 1988 - after abortion had been declared legal. NOW originally championed Becky because she was 17 at the time of her death, and Indiana, where Becky lived, had recently passed a parental notification law. Even so, Becky could still have obtained a legal abortion. All that said, the post-mortem report showed Becky died from pneumonia, not related to any abortion. In fact, that she even obtained an abortion in the first place is disputed, both by her best friend and also by the medical findings.

NOW's fourth example is Rosie Jiminez. Jiminez also died after abortion was made legal, in 1979. Pro-aborts blame her death on the Hyde Amendment, which banned taxpayer funding for Medicaid abortions. Pro-aborts blame us for not paying for Jiminez's abortion rather than themselves for not extending "charity" to Jiminez. Stop and THINK about that for a minute. They could have helped out with all of their money, and that of their partners over at Planned Parenthood, but they choose, instead to demonize anyone claiming that taxpayers shouldn't fund these kind of decisions, . . . interesting!! Furthermore, pro-aborts admit Jiminez died with a $700 scholarship check in her pocket that she "chose" not to use to procure a so-called "safe" abortion. So, apparently, NOW wants us to believe that they support everyone, whether they have good, sound, well-tested, and approved decision-making powers, or not. What's next?? NOW's support for pedophiles??

NOW's latter two examples would also make the point that legal access to abortion has not stopped bottom-bottom feeding abortionists (legal abortions being the bottom-feeders) from preying on desperate mothers, who suffer from the same societal embarassments that were always present, and will ALWAYS be present, whether abortions were/are legal, . . . or not.

Are you sure you want to go there, NOW?

God Bless,
Dan'L