Friday, August 26, 2005




How the Euro-Weenies work:

Remember when the government of Italy paid a reported sum in the millions to buy the release of that communist journalist sometime back??

In doing that, the government of Italy probably paid for the next 10,000 roadside bombs that killed our soldiers.

In negotiating with terrorists, they encouraged them to take more hostages, and put a price on the head of every one of our fighting men and women. Thanks a bunch.Well, they've done it again.

Today we get word that
Italy's Red Cross treated four insurgents (or Islamic terrorists, as the more correct term applies) and hid them from the United States in exchange for the freedom of two kidnapped aid workers.

The insurgents were even smuggled through U.S. checkpoints by the Italians.

Such hospitality for the enemy!!

The worst part?? Italian Premier Silvio Berlusconi signed off on the entire deal. Some ally, huh??

This is the difference between the way the United States, Britain and Australia handle terrorism and the way the Euro-Weenies and the rest of the world does it.

Islamic terrorists are low-life scum that must be killed as fast as possible.

To negotiate with them, to give them any legitimacy or any upper hand just makes the job 100 times more difficult.

This is why terrorism has become so widespread, . . . . because it is tolerated. It really makes you wonder just who are friends are these days.

By the way, . . . it's not wise to bring up this news event, . . . or even this topic, among your friends who may be members of the Democrat Party.

God Bless,
Dan'L

1 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

terrorism is bred by the "projection of power" policies of the US. if one tries to think properly, scientifically, without human bias and cultural prejudices, one can see clearly that it is (a substantial portion of it is) a natural evolution of modern warfare given the distribution of military strength and resources worldwide. the concept of "patriotism", be it US or Saudi or Hegemonia, is one of humankind's apelike notions. borders were drawn by religious zealots and racist (mostly european white) men who won certain seminal wars and proceeded to write most of recent history within the confines of their consequent self-righteousness, as is the nature of all humans. but if you look at the statistical development of history, it seems actually that the USA does not deviate much from the patterns of previous empires that rose and fell with time and ignorance (or rather brazen stupidity). it is rather amusing, watching the more disciplined (intellectually applied) strategy of the chinese as they build their empire patiently, almost sure to succeed the US as the next hegemon. the question is will the chinese run the world as stupidly as the US and thus be forced to fight with ever-sophisticated insurrections?

Saturday, August 27, 2005 4:59:00 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home